docs(release): update doc version from 1.2.0 to 1.3.0-beta.1 [skip ci]

node_modules/readable-stream/.travis.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+sudo: false
+language: node_js
+before_install:
+  - (test $NPM_LEGACY && npm install -g npm@2 && npm install -g npm@3) || true
+notifications:
+  email: false
+matrix:
+  fast_finish: true
+  include:
+  - node_js: '0.8'
+    env: NPM_LEGACY=true
+  - node_js: '0.10'
+    env: NPM_LEGACY=true
+  - node_js: '0.11'
+    env: NPM_LEGACY=true
+  - node_js: '0.12'
+    env: NPM_LEGACY=true
+  - node_js: 1
+    env: NPM_LEGACY=true
+  - node_js: 2
+    env: NPM_LEGACY=true
+  - node_js: 3
+    env: NPM_LEGACY=true
+  - node_js: 4
+  - node_js: 5
+  - node_js: 6
+  - node_js: 7
+  - node_js: 8
+  - node_js: 9
+script: "npm run test"
+env:
+  global:
+  - secure: rE2Vvo7vnjabYNULNyLFxOyt98BoJexDqsiOnfiD6kLYYsiQGfr/sbZkPMOFm9qfQG7pjqx+zZWZjGSswhTt+626C0t/njXqug7Yps4c3dFblzGfreQHp7wNX5TFsvrxd6dAowVasMp61sJcRnB2w8cUzoe3RAYUDHyiHktwqMc=
+  - secure: g9YINaKAdMatsJ28G9jCGbSaguXCyxSTy+pBO6Ch0Cf57ZLOTka3HqDj8p3nV28LUIHZ3ut5WO43CeYKwt4AUtLpBS3a0dndHdY6D83uY6b2qh5hXlrcbeQTq2cvw2y95F7hm4D1kwrgZ7ViqaKggRcEupAL69YbJnxeUDKWEdI=

node_modules/readable-stream/CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+# Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
+
+By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
+
+* (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
+  have the right to submit it under the open source license
+  indicated in the file; or
+
+* (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
+  of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
+  license and I have the right under that license to submit that
+  work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
+  by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
+  permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
+  in the file; or
+
+* (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
+  person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
+  it.
+
+* (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
+  are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
+  personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
+  maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
+  this project or the open source license(s) involved.
+
+## Moderation Policy
+
+The [Node.js Moderation Policy] applies to this WG.
+
+## Code of Conduct
+
+The [Node.js Code of Conduct][] applies to this WG.
+
+[Node.js Code of Conduct]:
+https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
+[Node.js Moderation Policy]:
+https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/blob/master/Moderation-Policy.md

node_modules/readable-stream/GOVERNANCE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+### Streams Working Group
+
+The Node.js Streams is jointly governed by a Working Group
+(WG)
+that is responsible for high-level guidance of the project.
+
+The WG has final authority over this project including:
+
+* Technical direction
+* Project governance and process (including this policy)
+* Contribution policy
+* GitHub repository hosting
+* Conduct guidelines
+* Maintaining the list of additional Collaborators
+
+For the current list of WG members, see the project
+[README.md](./README.md#current-project-team-members).
+
+### Collaborators
+
+The readable-stream GitHub repository is
+maintained by the WG and additional Collaborators who are added by the
+WG on an ongoing basis.
+
+Individuals making significant and valuable contributions are made
+Collaborators and given commit-access to the project. These
+individuals are identified by the WG and their addition as
+Collaborators is discussed during the WG meeting.
+
+_Note:_ If you make a significant contribution and are not considered
+for commit-access log an issue or contact a WG member directly and it
+will be brought up in the next WG meeting.
+
+Modifications of the contents of the readable-stream repository are
+made on
+a collaborative basis. Anybody with a GitHub account may propose a
+modification via pull request and it will be considered by the project
+Collaborators. All pull requests must be reviewed and accepted by a
+Collaborator with sufficient expertise who is able to take full
+responsibility for the change. In the case of pull requests proposed
+by an existing Collaborator, an additional Collaborator is required
+for sign-off. Consensus should be sought if additional Collaborators
+participate and there is disagreement around a particular
+modification. See _Consensus Seeking Process_ below for further detail
+on the consensus model used for governance.
+
+Collaborators may opt to elevate significant or controversial
+modifications, or modifications that have not found consensus to the
+WG for discussion by assigning the ***WG-agenda*** tag to a pull
+request or issue. The WG should serve as the final arbiter where
+required.
+
+For the current list of Collaborators, see the project
+[README.md](./README.md#members).
+
+### WG Membership
+
+WG seats are not time-limited.  There is no fixed size of the WG.
+However, the expected target is between 6 and 12, to ensure adequate
+coverage of important areas of expertise, balanced with the ability to
+make decisions efficiently.
+
+There is no specific set of requirements or qualifications for WG
+membership beyond these rules.
+
+The WG may add additional members to the WG by unanimous consensus.
+
+A WG member may be removed from the WG by voluntary resignation, or by
+unanimous consensus of all other WG members.
+
+Changes to WG membership should be posted in the agenda, and may be
+suggested as any other agenda item (see "WG Meetings" below).
+
+If an addition or removal is proposed during a meeting, and the full
+WG is not in attendance to participate, then the addition or removal
+is added to the agenda for the subsequent meeting.  This is to ensure
+that all members are given the opportunity to participate in all
+membership decisions.  If a WG member is unable to attend a meeting
+where a planned membership decision is being made, then their consent
+is assumed.
+
+No more than 1/3 of the WG members may be affiliated with the same
+employer.  If removal or resignation of a WG member, or a change of
+employment by a WG member, creates a situation where more than 1/3 of
+the WG membership shares an employer, then the situation must be
+immediately remedied by the resignation or removal of one or more WG
+members affiliated with the over-represented employer(s).
+
+### WG Meetings
+
+The WG meets occasionally on a Google Hangout On Air. A designated moderator
+approved by the WG runs the meeting. Each meeting should be
+published to YouTube.
+
+Items are added to the WG agenda that are considered contentious or
+are modifications of governance, contribution policy, WG membership,
+or release process.
+
+The intention of the agenda is not to approve or review all patches;
+that should happen continuously on GitHub and be handled by the larger
+group of Collaborators.
+
+Any community member or contributor can ask that something be added to
+the next meeting's agenda by logging a GitHub Issue. Any Collaborator,
+WG member or the moderator can add the item to the agenda by adding
+the ***WG-agenda*** tag to the issue.
+
+Prior to each WG meeting the moderator will share the Agenda with
+members of the WG. WG members can add any items they like to the
+agenda at the beginning of each meeting. The moderator and the WG
+cannot veto or remove items.
+
+The WG may invite persons or representatives from certain projects to
+participate in a non-voting capacity.
+
+The moderator is responsible for summarizing the discussion of each
+agenda item and sends it as a pull request after the meeting.
+
+### Consensus Seeking Process
+
+The WG follows a
+[Consensus
+Seeking](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus-seeking_decision-making)
+decision-making model.
+
+When an agenda item has appeared to reach a consensus the moderator
+will ask "Does anyone object?" as a final call for dissent from the
+consensus.
+
+If an agenda item cannot reach a consensus a WG member can call for
+either a closing vote or a vote to table the issue to the next
+meeting. The call for a vote must be seconded by a majority of the WG
+or else the discussion will continue. Simple majority wins.
+
+Note that changes to WG membership require a majority consensus.  See
+"WG Membership" above.

node_modules/readable-stream/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# readable-stream
+
+***Node-core v8.11.1 streams for userland*** [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/nodejs/readable-stream.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/nodejs/readable-stream)
+
+
+[![NPM](https://nodei.co/npm/readable-stream.png?downloads=true&downloadRank=true)](https://nodei.co/npm/readable-stream/)
+[![NPM](https://nodei.co/npm-dl/readable-stream.png?&months=6&height=3)](https://nodei.co/npm/readable-stream/)
+
+
+[![Sauce Test Status](https://saucelabs.com/browser-matrix/readable-stream.svg)](https://saucelabs.com/u/readable-stream)
+
+```bash
+npm install --save readable-stream
+```
+
+***Node-core streams for userland***
+
+This package is a mirror of the Streams2 and Streams3 implementations in
+Node-core.
+
+Full documentation may be found on the [Node.js website](https://nodejs.org/dist/v8.11.1/docs/api/stream.html).
+
+If you want to guarantee a stable streams base, regardless of what version of
+Node you, or the users of your libraries are using, use **readable-stream** *only* and avoid the *"stream"* module in Node-core, for background see [this blogpost](http://r.va.gg/2014/06/why-i-dont-use-nodes-core-stream-module.html).
+
+As of version 2.0.0 **readable-stream** uses semantic versioning.
+
+# Streams Working Group
+
+`readable-stream` is maintained by the Streams Working Group, which
+oversees the development and maintenance of the Streams API within
+Node.js. The responsibilities of the Streams Working Group include:
+
+* Addressing stream issues on the Node.js issue tracker.
+* Authoring and editing stream documentation within the Node.js project.
+* Reviewing changes to stream subclasses within the Node.js project.
+* Redirecting changes to streams from the Node.js project to this
+  project.
+* Assisting in the implementation of stream providers within Node.js.
+* Recommending versions of `readable-stream` to be included in Node.js.
+* Messaging about the future of streams to give the community advance
+  notice of changes.
+
+<a name="members"></a>
+## Team Members
+
+* **Chris Dickinson** ([@chrisdickinson](https://github.com/chrisdickinson)) &lt;christopher.s.dickinson@gmail.com&gt;
+  - Release GPG key: 9554F04D7259F04124DE6B476D5A82AC7E37093B
+* **Calvin Metcalf** ([@calvinmetcalf](https://github.com/calvinmetcalf)) &lt;calvin.metcalf@gmail.com&gt;
+  - Release GPG key: F3EF5F62A87FC27A22E643F714CE4FF5015AA242
+* **Rod Vagg** ([@rvagg](https://github.com/rvagg)) &lt;rod@vagg.org&gt;
+  - Release GPG key: DD8F2338BAE7501E3DD5AC78C273792F7D83545D
+* **Sam Newman** ([@sonewman](https://github.com/sonewman)) &lt;newmansam@outlook.com&gt;
+* **Mathias Buus** ([@mafintosh](https://github.com/mafintosh)) &lt;mathiasbuus@gmail.com&gt;
+* **Domenic Denicola** ([@domenic](https://github.com/domenic)) &lt;d@domenic.me&gt;
+* **Matteo Collina** ([@mcollina](https://github.com/mcollina)) &lt;matteo.collina@gmail.com&gt;
+  - Release GPG key: 3ABC01543F22DD2239285CDD818674489FBC127E
+* **Irina Shestak** ([@lrlna](https://github.com/lrlna)) &lt;shestak.irina@gmail.com&gt;

node_modules/readable-stream/doc/wg-meetings/2015-01-30.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# streams WG Meeting 2015-01-30
+
+## Links
+
+* **Google Hangouts Video**: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9nDOSGfwZg
+* **GitHub Issue**: https://github.com/iojs/readable-stream/issues/106
+* **Original Minutes Google Doc**: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17aTgLnjMXIrfjgNaTUnHQO7m3xgzHR2VXBTmi03Qii4/
+
+## Agenda
+
+Extracted from https://github.com/iojs/readable-stream/labels/wg-agenda prior to meeting.
+
+* adopt a charter [#105](https://github.com/iojs/readable-stream/issues/105)
+* release and versioning strategy [#101](https://github.com/iojs/readable-stream/issues/101)
+* simpler stream creation [#102](https://github.com/iojs/readable-stream/issues/102)
+* proposal: deprecate implicit flowing of streams [#99](https://github.com/iojs/readable-stream/issues/99)
+
+## Minutes
+
+### adopt a charter
+
+* group: +1's all around
+
+### What versioning scheme should be adopted?
+* group: +1’s 3.0.0
+* domenic+group: pulling in patches from other sources where appropriate
+* mikeal: version independently, suggesting versions for io.js
+* mikeal+domenic: work with TC to notify in advance of changes
+simpler stream creation
+
+### streamline creation of streams
+* sam: streamline creation of streams
+* domenic: nice simple solution posted
+  but, we lose the opportunity to change the model
+  may not be backwards incompatible (double check keys)
+
+  **action item:** domenic will check
+
+### remove implicit flowing of streams on(‘data’)
+* add isFlowing / isPaused
+* mikeal: worrying that we’re documenting polyfill methods – confuses users
+* domenic: more reflective API is probably good, with warning labels for users
+* new section for mad scientists (reflective stream access)
+* calvin: name the “third state”
+* mikeal: maybe borrow the name from whatwg?
+* domenic: we’re missing the “third state”
+* consensus: kind of difficult to name the third state
+* mikeal: figure out differences in states / compat
+* mathias: always flow on data – eliminates third state
+  * explore what it breaks
+
+**action items:**
+* ask isaac for ability to list packages by what public io.js APIs they use (esp. Stream)
+* ask rod/build for infrastructure
+* **chris**: explore the “flow on data” approach
+* add isPaused/isFlowing
+* add new docs section
+* move isPaused to that section
+
+